The En-Route NOTAMS seem fine, however In some FIR (EGTT) NOTAM info pasted in from Navair has some oddness.



Example:

Theres two notams for shoreham, which are:



Ref: C0568/10

FIR: EGTT

Code: MRLC

Traffic: VFR IFR

Purpose: Immed. atten. aircraft operators PIB entry Operationally significant for flights

Scope: Aerodrome

Lower limit (FL): 000

Upper limit (FL): 999

Centre and radius (nm): 5050N00018W005

Parent ICAO: EGKA

Start date/time: 17/01/2010 17:04 UTC

End date/time: 24/01/2010 18:00 UTC(estimate)

Activity period: null

Lower height limit: 000

Upper height limit: 999



GRASS RWY 07/25 AND 13/31 CLSD TO FIXED WING ACFT DUE FLOODING



AND:

Ref: C0569/10

FIR: EGTT

Code: LBAS

Traffic: VFR

Purpose: Misc

Scope: Aerodrome

Lower limit (FL): 000

Upper limit (FL): 999

Centre and radius (nm): 5050N00018W005

Parent ICAO: EGKA

Start date/time: 17/01/2010 17:15 UTC

End date/time: 24/01/2010 18:00 UTC(estimate)

Activity period: null

Lower height limit: 000

Upper height limit: 999



IBN 'SH' U/S



Skydemon shows the first EGKA with Biggin Hill in the text, so I suspect the Parsing is doing some strange stuff.

From Tempo

Same thing happens with Goodwood Notam that picks up the Eaglescott info.

From Tempo

Heres the source thats pasted.. I think the parsing is in error. Unless, Im misreading the way to get NOTAMs pasted in from the external site?

From Tempo